<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deskfans, Optical Illusions, Windows Vista, WebOS&#8217;s, and Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/2006/06/08/deskfans-optical-illusions-windows-vista-weboss-and-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/2006/06/08/deskfans-optical-illusions-windows-vista-weboss-and-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>My Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: malt</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/2006/06/08/deskfans-optical-illusions-windows-vista-weboss-and-windows-vista/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>malt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/?p=54#comment-685</guid>
		<description>That music sounds like tennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That music sounds like tennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippie</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/2006/06/08/deskfans-optical-illusions-windows-vista-weboss-and-windows-vista/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/?p=54#comment-684</guid>
		<description>The source of the information was an RM technical seminar so the information was reliable, but seeing as the seminar was exclusively for schools I guess they assumed a lower than average machine spec and probably fairly old PCs.

The only problems I've found with it so far is that it doesn't always register a click when clicking on a vb style button (I am currently on my xp installation as I couldn't click "Submit Comment" on the vista one)
Also, when running the tool to see if my machine was 'vista ready' it said I not only need a new graphics card - which is true, but also that I have a 0.00 Hz processor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The source of the information was an RM technical seminar so the information was reliable, but seeing as the seminar was exclusively for schools I guess they assumed a lower than average machine spec and probably fairly old PCs.</p>
<p>The only problems I&#8217;ve found with it so far is that it doesn&#8217;t always register a click when clicking on a vb style button (I am currently on my xp installation as I couldn&#8217;t click &#8220;Submit Comment&#8221; on the vista one)<br />
Also, when running the tool to see if my machine was &#8216;vista ready&#8217; it said I not only need a new graphics card - which is true, but also that I have a 0.00 Hz processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mysterious X</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/2006/06/08/deskfans-optical-illusions-windows-vista-weboss-and-windows-vista/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mysterious X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/?p=54#comment-683</guid>
		<description>A lot has been said about the vista requirements; most of it untrue.

For the "full" graphics engine, most computers up to 2 years old will run it.
After that, Vista will still run very well, just without all the flashy 3D effects (it falls back to an XP-like interface).  I think most computers up to 5 years old should easily run vista in classic mode.
After all, minimum requirements are an 800 MHz processor and 512 of system RAM (the 7 year old computer in my cupboard has that :))

Even on full mode, it only requires a 1 GHz processor and a gig of RAM, and a 128 MB graphics card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot has been said about the vista requirements; most of it untrue.</p>
<p>For the &#8220;full&#8221; graphics engine, most computers up to 2 years old will run it.<br />
After that, Vista will still run very well, just without all the flashy 3D effects (it falls back to an XP-like interface).  I think most computers up to 5 years old should easily run vista in classic mode.<br />
After all, minimum requirements are an 800 MHz processor and 512 of system RAM (the 7 year old computer in my cupboard has that :))</p>
<p>Even on full mode, it only requires a 1 GHz processor and a gig of RAM, and a 128 MB graphics card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chippie</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/2006/06/08/deskfans-optical-illusions-windows-vista-weboss-and-windows-vista/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Chippie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.omega.org.uk/wordpress/?p=54#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Downloading vista right now, I think i'll have to wait till tomorrow to try it out (have you tried pressing Shift + Alt + Tab to get the ring binder type effect?)
By the sound of things a lot of current on board graphics cards won't be able to cope with the stuff vista will chuck at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downloading vista right now, I think i&#8217;ll have to wait till tomorrow to try it out (have you tried pressing Shift + Alt + Tab to get the ring binder type effect?)<br />
By the sound of things a lot of current on board graphics cards won&#8217;t be able to cope with the stuff vista will chuck at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
